In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: : : > > I posted one approach to this today... touch a file right before you : > > start installworld, then consider anything not newer than that file a : > > candidate for disposal. There is currently something weird going on in : > > /usr/lib though... a lot of the files don't have newer dates, I haven't : > > tracked down why yet. : > > : > This is because static libraries are installed with -C. The reasoning : > was like this: : > : > On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 02:15:56PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: : > > Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 12:28:17PM -0800, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: : > > > > Log: : > > > > Install static and profiled libraries with -C. : > > > Um why, what's so special about them? : > > : > > They appear in dependency lists. This was discussed on -arch. : : Can you fill in a little more detail here? I really prefer the old : behavior, not using -C. : : > This also will not work for anything that has not changed and is : > installed with -C, that is includes, : : I posted my script to -current just today. I 'mv include include-old' to : handle this. I also blow away /usr/share/man, since creating it from : scratch is just as easy as trying to cleanse it. : : > rtld-elf, and some parts of /sys/boot. : : I haven't touched /boot yet, I'm not that brave. :) There are a couple : other things that my script doesn't handle just on the basis of "newer : than," but as a proof of concept it's quite functional.
The mv /usr/foo -> /usr/foo.old is too dangerous, and I think it is the wrong way to go. Warner _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"