In the last episode (Sep 04), David O'Brien said: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:27:15PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:58:39PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > [...] > > > The patch is not a problem (attached). I've been looking at how > > > our friends do this. NetBSD has symlinks in /usr/lib to /lib, > > > both to .so and .so.X, and their cc(1) and ld(1) don't look > > > things in /lib. Linux looks things up in both /lib and /usr/lib, > > > and does not have symlinks from /usr/lib to /lib. > > > > > There is a sad typo above: Linux *does* have symlinks from /usr/lib > > to /lib, so both use /usr/lib for linking. > > What version of Linux are you using? SuSE Enterprise Linux 8, and > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 both do not have symlinks for libs from > /usr/lib to /lib. They use a different machanism:
I haven't updated in a while, but my Debian unstable box has .. $ find /usr/lib/*.so -type l -ls | grep "> /lib" | wc -l 24 .. symlinks back to /lib. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"