On Monday 17 November 2003 06:08, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 05:41:04AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: *SNIP* > I can assure you that the numerical simulations I run, along with > the "make worlds", and compilations of gcc's tree-ssa branch > stress the system. I re-install over 100 ports today and the > load average was rarely below 5. I was use linux-opera and > knews and sylpheed and several other program and noticed > nor degradation in responsiveness. Does seti cause a problem > if you are not running X (or KDE).
That reflects my opinion that this awful interactivity only occurs if ATA-disk-access is involved! Sorry for this second replay. I'm in hurry while I don't know why [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Harry > > > I haven't claimed ULE to be unstable though. I just wanted to highlight > > some issues which will be a big problem if 5.2-releas will have ULE as > > default! > > If ULE is destined to be the default scheduler in 5-stable, then > we need to have more people test it.
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
