> > So far, I haven't seen anyone in this thread seriously > > argue against either of these points. > > I'll seriously argue against the 2nd point above. I don't know of a > SINGLE person that uses /bin/sh as their interactive shell when > multi-user. Not ONE. Every Bourne shell'ish user I've ever met uses > Bash, AT&T ksh, pdksh, zsh. >
I'm one... I have to operate on many disparate systems with the same home directory.... some of the bourne-shell variants (e.g. HP/UX's ksh) will lock-up on my simple bourne-shell .profile. So - I stick with the "plain/old/boring" sh. - Dave R. - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: (919) 676-0847 Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"