On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:27:06 +0300, Alex Keda <ad...@lissyara.su> wrote:
> On 05.03.2010 14:16, Doug Rabson wrote:
>> On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:10:43 +0300, Alex Keda<ad...@lissyara.su> 
>>> On 05.03.2010 13:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>>> In message<4b90e171.2040...@lissyara.su>, Alex Keda writes:
>>>>> then can a more correct name of the project or ClosedBSD or
>> ManagedBSD?
>>>>> =)
>>>>> or something abstract?
>>>> You are free to use any other operating system of your choice, if you
>>>> are not happy with FreeBSD.
>>>> Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
>>> I'm not going anywhere, not even hope for it =)
>>> I'm trying to make FreeBSD a better, more logical.
>>> Maybe that's not very successful, but judging by the number of
>>> responses, it hurt many, and made to think even more people.
>> I think you misunderstand. Some of us old-timers have been having this
>> discussion repeatedly for well over ten years. It always ends up the
>> way - a re-org might make the source tree marginally prettier but the
>> consequences for long-term maintenance and supporting downstream
>> contributors outweigh any possible benefit. Having the same
>> every two years with the same outcome gets annoying.
> And the fact that this issue was raised with enviable regularity - not 
> make you think that it really needs to be done?

Read what I wrote. Consequences outweigh benefits so no. On the other
hand, if you are just trolling, please try somewhere else.

freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to