On 04/25/10 19:03, Scott Long wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 04/25/10 03:23, Alexander Best wrote:
>>> another option would be to have a ata(4)->cam(4)->ata(4)
>>> emulation.
>>
>> What would be the value of doing all of that work as opposed to
>> just using one of the available options that already work with cam
>> such as cdrecord?
>>
>
> I think that there's a valid argument for having a cd recording
> program in the base system.
I'm not sure I agree with you, but that's orthogonal to the OP. :)
> cdrecord is an excellent program, but I
> don't believe that it's a good candidate to try to import into
> FreeBSD.
Agreed on that ... and I'm not opposed to your previous idea of
rewriting burncd to work with the new world order. I'm just not sure
that the multi-layer idea to make the old burncd work is a good idea.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
