On Friday 20 January 2012 07:51:41 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I have seen that some ports use INSTALLS_* from bsd.xorg.mk, some others do > the mkfontscale first and directly package the fonts.scale fonts.* stuff > in the package.
Just a random thought: may it be that there is also no consistency in fonts tarballs upstream packaging? > (do we still need that FontPath thing?, if no then the > pkg-message asking people to fill it should be dropped) I think we do, but will try and report. > If you are not willing to write the page, I'll do, but I need someone > describing me how things are working together in the font world. Unfortunately I don't know this kind of stuff. If no one here does, we might call for help in x11@ (eadler?)... -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <[email protected]> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla As of next Thursday, UNIX will be flushed in favor of TOPS-10. Please update your programs.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
