https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291816
--- Comment #4 from Ivan Rozhuk <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #3) "fixed problems to me compared to an old kqueue-based implementation." same to me with my FAM opposite "libinotify-kqueue" and "kqueue". > does not pass glib's own test suite I do not care tests, I do care real usability. As I pointed many times: tests are not representative. > accepted upstream I had try to do same, but with no luck. I do not want waste additional time anymore to "make it as series of small patches to existing kqueue backend". > I think it is better to polish the inotify-kqueue one. Let users to chose what is better. > Maybe gnome@ people would like to look into problems you mentioned Without async open() in my patch - probably native inotify@FBSD15 will work worse in some use cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
