On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Chris Rees <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1 Apr 2013 05:25, "Eitan Adler" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Over the past several months I have been working on a project called > > ThwackAFAQ. For those who don't know this project has been to review, > > edit, and rewrite the FAQ to be relevant to the modern day. > > I've removed references to hardware that hasn't been sold in over 10 > > years or to software features that reached their EoL in FreeBSD 2.x. > > At this date I feel the project has reached a level of maturity such > > that it makes sense to write this email: > > > > I propose that we merge the handbook into the FAQ. > > > > While they both cover the same material the handbook source is over > > 83892 lines of XML while the FAQ is now at a measly 8242 lines. > > Further the FAQ is in bite sized chunks while the FAQ requires lots of > > tedious reading. Translators currently have issues keeping up with > > the pace of changes in both books, and must translate the same basic > > content twice. If only we could have one clear and canonical source > > for translators to work with. > > > > Sure there are some topics not covered in the same depth in the FAQ > > but many Linux distributions solve this in a very nice way: distribute > > the details and extraneous items to bloggers and tip writers. This > > releases us, the doc team, from all the extra work of writing and fact > > checking things that will no longer be true in the next version of > > FreeBSD. Not only that but it even generates more content for the > > front page where we publish articles written about the operating > > system. > > > > Over the next few weeks (as soon as the doc slush ends) I intend to > > move the last few remaining portions of the handbook into the FAQ and > > commit the removal of the handbook once and for all. > > I'm going to ruin the April Fool here because I'm worried you'll get > lynched. > > Nice one :) > > Chris > Actually a more useful step is to move answers to questions into the Handbook . The FreeBSD Handbook with its present structure is a very nice work . Some documentation solely based on questions and answers are not appealing like the FreeBSD Handbook , and in reality , they are difficult to use , because there are no regular structure in them . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
