On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:41:46 +0100
Isabell Long <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
I sent this idea to the #bsddocs IRC channel a few days ago and no-one
there objected, but here you go. I'd like to know your opinions on the
documentation font being changed from serif to sans-serif. This would
only affect the web-based docs, not the ones being prepared for print.
An example of this is at
http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ ,
and a diff of my very simple changes is at
http://tau.devrandom.co.uk/issyl0/docs_font.diff
In my opinion, it makes a hugely positive difference and modernises
the look of the documentation set.
how old are you?
The serif fonts are easier to read for older people.
I agree, it looks more modern. But what is the idea behind a
documentation? Look good or being read by people for the content.
Try viewing the two versions in side-by-side windows. The serif fonts
were a lot blobbier and less sharp for me. Aliasing and antialiasing at
work with limited resolution.
Serif is easier to read in print, but that's much higher resolution.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
