On 29 May 2013 02:24, Warren Block <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 28 May 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >> I have a patch to preview how it would look like: >> http://kovesdan.org/patches/fbsd-docbook5.diff >> >> Please comment on this. It is very important to discuss this kind of >> changes. > > > I think that keeping up with DocBook versions is important. > > Leaving out the systemitem class simplifies markup. One nice thing about > those classes is that they remove ambiguity during editing. Without them, it > may be difficult to tell from context whether a systemitem is a username or > a directory name, for example. Although if that is not clear from context, > it suggests the text needs improvement.
Agreed. Unless the class could be used to provide additional formatting options I don't see the need for it here. It provides semantic value, but I don't think much is gained from that here. -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
