On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 09:49:44PM -0400, Fbsd8 wrote: > Hello Remko: > > You are way off base here. Your judgment is clouded by things that > have no bearing on this PR. > > The handbook jail chapter rewrite has nothing to do with ezjail or > qjail ports. If you would have taken the time to study the html doc > you would have seen that for your self. Just because qjail was > created by Filipinos who are not knowledgeable in open source > protocol is no reason to insinuate things were done on purpose with > intent. We now know we erred in judgment and have resolved the > problem. So lets put this behind us and move on with this PR. > > The word "rewite" in the PR subject means this html content is > intended to replace the existing content of the current handbook > chapter 16. The PR "subject" sure seem very clear in that meaning. >
Well, where is mention of the jail(8) utility in your "rewrite"? Based on a cursory reading, you replaced the native base system functionality with a set of scripts. Where is the information for people who do not want to use your scripts? > If the Doc group members feels that they want to keep the current > outdated handbook chapter 16 content, and add what I wrote as > another sub-section, thats for the Doc team members to discuss and > decide as a group. > > From the tone of what you wrote I don't feel you can be fair and > professional in your judgment concerning this PR. If you can > convince me that you can put the past behind you and change your > attitude them you can work this PR, otherwise just return it to open > status for some other Doc member to select to take it on. > As far as I am concerned, the PR originator's attitude remains negative, and unchanged. I suggest the PR be permanently closed without further review until he decides to reevaluate his harmful (to the Project) point of view. Glen
pgpfRXh9hBvAO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
