On 07-07-2013 22:14, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Em 07-07-2013 21:00, René Ladan escreveu: >> Heh, missed that myself too. So now only tidying up or synchronizing >> whitespace for share/xml/catalog.xml remains to be done? > Personally, I think it would be better to commit that whitespace fix > separately. Even if you committed it separately in the branch, it > would go to head intermixed with real changes, which makes it hard to > read the backlog. This is a disadvantage in general and it is quite a > big hassle for translators. I think you did it fine since you didn't > have to foresee these consequences but maybe we should document it as > a best practice to avoid whitespace changes in branches. > I didn't think it through this far, but you're right. I think it's best to write this down somewhere in the FDP?
For now this is fixed in head (r42191, whitespace-only forward commit) and in projects/entities (r42192, fix some inadvertent changes). The only changes left are those from r40196, which are intended (modulo inline whitespace :-( ). René _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
