On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:32:12PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > On 2013.07.28. 22:23, Glen Barber wrote: > >On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 10:17:50PM +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > >>>I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these > >>>extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is > >>>Java-based and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java > >>>for PDF rendering, it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast > >>>and Java-free so that committers can easily test their work. > >>> > >Yes, please, let's keep it Java-free... > > > >IMHO, it is bad enough some of use require use of Java for basic web > >browsing. Adding that to a our doc build is a big red bug. > What do you mean for basic web browsing? Where is Java required for that? >
Unfortunately some regular sites I have to visit. My real point is that making Java part of our regular doc build, IMHO, is a regression. Glen
pgpTrymjysn0j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
