On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:41:29PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Glen Barber <g...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:12:30PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: > > > > all options should be documented. An undocumented option is a bug. > > > > If we don't want people using it we should document as such. > > > > > > > > > > It is documented. > > > > > > case 'q': > > > /* compatibility option */ > > > break; > > > > > > > Source code comments IMO don't qualify for docs. > > > > It should be documented in the man page. There are plenty of other > > examples cite option X is there for compatibility/historical purposes. > > Most users aren't going to review the source code for docs. > > > > Since it does nothing, it absolutely applies, IMHO. > You're right, it is < trivial. However it's still technically a bug. Maybe there is no good reason for q's existence. -- Adam _______________________________________________ freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
