Dne 29.3.2014 3:32, Thomas Hoffmann napsal(a):
I was reading the handbook and stumbled upon the following sentence:
"Failover allows traffic to continue to flow even if an interface becomes
available."
Also, does "an interface" convey what we need here? For any given N-way
aggregation, can't we have N-1 (one or more, but not all) interfaces become
unavailable and still have a working link?
And Cpt. Obvious may add an interface is not enough, you can have four
interfaces aggregated in the bond, but there is still no flow without a
link. To add even more chaos, both the physical and virtual interfaces
are mentioned in the sentence preceding the one which Rafael mentions.
That said, what about something like following?
Failover allows traffic to continue to flow if at least one aggregated
network interface has link established.
--
Ondra Knezour
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
