On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Hoyoung Kim wrote:

Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?

The original FDP files follow the style like this:

     <para>We have tried to keep the number of forward references in
       the text to a minimum so that you can read this section of the
       Handbook from front to back with the minimum page flipping
       required.</para>

This is another example:

   <listitem>
     <para>Introduce you to X, the &unix; windowing system, and
       detail how to configure a desktop environment that makes
       you more productive.</para>
   </listitem>

These are correct.

However, when I press P in Vim Visual mode to reformat selected text, the style changes like this:

     <para>We have tried to keep the number of forward references in
     the text to a minimum so that you can read this section of the
     Handbook from front to back with the minimum page flipping
     required.</para>

And this:

   <listitem> <para>Introduce you to X, the &unix; windowing
   system, and detail how to configure a desktop environment that
   makes you more productive.</para> </listitem>

These are not correct.

All the original files follow the former style, but FDP Primer suggests the latter style.
(https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/editor-config.html#editor-config-vim)

I want to know whether the latter style is allowed or not.

No, the first style is the correct way.

Should I manually indent paragraphs after pressing P?

If the editor does not do it correctly, yes.

Providing a default editor config does not suggest that editor does everything correctly. vim users might be able to help more. I have yet to find any editor that really does our indenting correctly. Maybe some programming can improve on what vim or emacs does by default.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to