https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256182
Mark Millard <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Mark Millard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Graham Perrin from comment #1) My guess from the wording of the described plan: QUOTE from https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-hackers/2021-May/057357.html : So to avoid breaking the bookmark, the plan now is to keep a copy as-is of the pipermail archives, (not the redirection). and have the new archives elsewhere. The open question now is the new archives should they provide the ancient mail as well? for now it has been decided yes, to not break threads, but restarting from scratch would also be a very good option END QUOTE is that the URL's with something like the old style prefix: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ would at some point start accessing the "as-is" copy of the pipermail archives. Thus in my original report where googling and trying the link found lead to trying to go to: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2019-December/020854.html but it displayed the wrong message, that procedure should at some point correctly display the original message that I was trying to find. See: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs/2021-May/101990.html and later related messages for the content of my original report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
