https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207735
--- Comment #5 from Mark Johnston <ma...@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #4) Yes. Sorry, I've just been very busy with work. I've spent more time looking at the code, and I think raising DTRACE_FUNCNAMELEN isn't a bad way to address the problem. I said in comment 3 that a buffer of size DTRACE_FUNCNAMELEN is created for every single probe, but this isn't right. It's only used when passing probe descriptions between userland and the kernel, for instance when running dtrace -l, or when creating an enabling. I'll look at DTrace memory usage with and without a change that doubles this constant. Assuming I haven't missed anything, the difference should not be significant. I'll also modify the DOF validation code so that we simply skip probes with excessively long function names. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-dtrace@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-dtrace To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-dtrace-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
