On Tuesday 16 March 2010 05:02:21 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting John Nielsen <[email protected]> (from Mon, 15 Mar 2010 > > 20:46:05 -0400): > > On Sunday 07 March 2010 05:44:37 am Ed Schouten wrote: > >> * Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:15:12 +0100 Ed Schouten <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > I am still in doubt what to do. Maybe we could consider committing > >> > > a patch like this: > >> > > >> > [...] > >> > > >> > > This is a bit more complete. What it does, is that it creates a > >> > > symlink from /proc/%d/fd to /dev/fd, only if the calling process > >> > > matches. Then when you mount fdescfs on /dev/fd, it also does the > >> > > right thing, because it will always readlink() on a character > >> > > device, which also returns an error code. > >> > > > >> > > Comments, suggestions anyone? > >> > > >> > Looks better than the one before. :) > >> > >> Great. Just committed it to SVN: > >> > >> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&revision=204825 > > > > I finally tried the patch from SVN today and it does NOT resolve the > > openpty issue on FreeBSD 8-STABLE amd64 + CentOS 5.4 i386 jail + > > OpenSSH 4.3p2. I still (or again) get the "fatal: openpty returns > > device for which ttyname fails." message. > > Just to verify: You have fdeskfs mounted in the linux jail?
Err.. no. Did I miss that requirement? :) I'll give that a go with the SVN linproc patch. JN _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
