On 05/26/10 15:38, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Beat Gaetzi <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 05/26/10 08:27, Brandon Gooch wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Jung-uk Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Thursday 29 April 2010 09:02 pm, Michael Butler wrote: >>>>> On 04/29/10 19:23, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>>>>> I read the source again and I found it is not "patched" by the >>>>>> emulator itself. It's done from usual _CRS method. Please try >>>>>> the attached patch instead. >>>>> >>>>> Now I get .. >>>>> >>>>> kBuild: iasl DevicesR3 - >>>>> /usr/home/imb/svn/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.0_OSE/src/VBox >>>>> /Devices/PC/vbox-cpuhotplug.dsl >>>>> /usr/home/imb/svn/virtualbox-ose/work/VirtualBox-3.2.0_OSE/out/free >>>>> bsd.x86/release/obj/DevicesR3/vboxssdt-cpuhotplug.hex.pre 14: >>>>> Device (SCK0) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0004") Name (_UID, "SCKCPU0") >>>>> Processor (CPU0, 0x00, 0x0, 0x0 ) { Name (_HID, "ACPI0007") Name >>>>> (_UID, "SCK0-CPU0") Name (_PXM, 0x00) Method(_MAT, 0) { IF >>>>> (CPCK(0x00)) { Name (APIC, Buffer (8) {0x00, 0x08, 0x00, 0x00, >>>>> 0x01}) Return(APIC) } Else { Return (0x00) } } Method(_STA) { IF >>>>> (CPCK(0x00)) { Return (0xF) } Else { Return (0x0) } } Method(_EJ0, >>>>> 1) { Store(0x00, \_SB.CPUL) Return } } } >>>>> >>>>> Error 4080 - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Invalid object type for reserved >>>>> name ^ (found INTEGER, requires Buffer) >>>>> >>>>> .. where the "Return(0x00)" as the alternate result to >>>>> "Result(APIC)" is causing an issue, >>>> >>>> Sigh... A new file, a new bug. :-( >>>> >>>> Try the attached patch. >>> >>> It seems this patch has been committed to the 'virtualbox-ose-devel' >>> port, but your previous patch (attached to an earlier message in this >>> thread) did not. Will you submit the original patch to the >>> freebsd-vbox crew as well? >> >> I forgot to commit this patch to the virtualbox-ose-devel port as our >> main focus is on the 3.2.0 port at the moment with already includes this >> patch. I will commit the patch in a few minutes to the -devel port. >> > I see... Well, as it stands, both of my laptops, one running CURRENT, > the other running 8.1-PRERELEASE, panic when loading the vboxdrv > module right now (on 3.2.1 at least), so I'm looking to rollback to > 3.1.8 -- or test 3.2.0 :)
We received a few reports from users that 3.2.0 panics the host when loading the kernel module. This is the reason why we haven't announced a CFT for 3.2.0 yet. > Will you announce to the list when we VirtualBox users should begin > testing 3.2.0? Or did I already miss that? Yes, our plan is to announce a CFT for 3.2.0 once we think the port is in a good shape. Beat _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
