Hi, I read this as old unbranded linux binaries can still reboot the system out of the blue. As such I would say that we should keep the good example of branding of linux binaries (business as usual).
Bye, Alexander. -- Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <[email protected]> hat geschrieben:On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux binaries > is resolved in all supported branches? > The static linux binaries built with the modern binutils are implicitely branded. > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and > spelling errors. Kostik Belousov <[email protected]> hat geschrieben:On > Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec. > > Should those files be branded to linux? > I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1)) > for any supported FreeBSD release and Linux binary built with > relatively modern Linux toolchain.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
