El día Thursday, June 13, 2013 a las 12:43:45PM -0700, Yuri escribió:
> On 06/13/2013 12:14, Artyom Mirgorodskiy wrote:
> > I would like to share my experience of running Skype 4.0.0.8.
>
> Is it any better in your opinion?
> I saw 4.1.0.20 in Linux and functionally it is all the same, except
> "Away" status is gone. I don't like it because it only takes away
> flexibility without adding value.
I'm facing the problem that video stops working in Sk calls between
skype-2.1.0.81_1,1 (from the actual ports) and Windows Skype versions of
6.x; the call establishes fine, audio is fine but the video is
dropped/rejected; this is not a local problem because video works fine
between skype-2.1.0.81_1,1 and skype-2.1.0.81_1,1; it looks more that
there are changes in the protocol or codecs or whatever; for this a
working 4.x (congratulations!!!) could be a step to get it working
again;
> Maybe it is a good idea to create a new net-im/skype4 instead of pushing
> everybody to 4.X ?
net-im/skype4 would be really nice
matthias
--
Sent from my FreeBSD netbook
Matthias Apitz, <g...@unixarea.de>, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211
UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370)
UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5
_______________________________________________
freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
