On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:46:51 +0200
Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Boris Samorodov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > 19.06.2013 15:18, René Ladan пишет:
> >
> >> right now we have three Linux DRI ports around:
> >> - graphics/linux-dri74 (Ubuntu 9.09)
> >> - graphics/linux_dri (unknown, PORTVERSION 7.0)
> >> - graphics/linux-f10-dri
> >>
> >> Currently graphics/linux-dri74 is the default.  I plan to modify
> >> bsd.linux-apps.mk and bsd.port.mk to change this to linux-f10-dri,
> >> after which the other two ports can be removed.
> >>
> >> See the attached patch (INDEX build is fine, no runtime testing
> >> done yet).
> >
> > No objection from me.
> > Thanks!
> 
> LGTM

Do we have a way to use a ${LINUX_DIST_SUFFIX} in the bsd.port.mk part?
I expect the answer is no, but I would love that someone prove me wrong
here for the sake of not hardcoding a specific version here. If nobody
has an idea how to have this working in this way, I would like to see a
comment in bsd.linux-apps.mk which points the the _GL_linux_RUN_DEPENDS
variable in b.p.m which specially mentions to update the b.l-a.m part
(and the other way too).

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to