Le dim 16 mar 14 à 18:55:15 +0100, Alexander Leidinger <[email protected]> écrivait : > On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:15:24 +0100 (CET) > Thierry Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >Synopsis: Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk does not allow grouping rules > > >(:something) > [...] > > >Fix: > > Please apply this patch: > > > > --- bsd.linux-rpm.mk.diff begins here --- > > --- Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk.orig 2014-01-21 21:18:37.000000000 > > +0100 +++ Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk 2014-02-12 21:03:50.000000000 > > +0100 @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ > > # is not true. > > > > DISTFILES?= ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} > > -BIN_DISTFILES:= ${DISTFILES} > > +BIN_DISTFILES:= ${_DISTFILES} > > SRC_DISTFILES?= ${DISTNAME}${SRC_SUFX} > > EXTRACT_ONLY?= ${BIN_DISTFILES} > > This is all what is needed to make this work? Did you test this with > some linux ports (e.g. linux_base)?
Seems so! > If you have tested and there is no fallout, I have no objections. > If you haven't tested a lot I recommend to test (if in doubt, an > exp-run, else a representative list of ports and a commitment to fix > reports of broken ports). I have tested the proposed patch with the port devel/linux-f10-devtools (the used patch is included in the PR, paragraph "How-To-Repeat"), but I have not tested it against other ports. In this case, an exp-run is not very useful: if you only apply the patch to Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk, anything is modified. To see the change, the other linux ports have to use the groups. I'll do the test for emulators/linux_base-f10 and some others, and will post the results here. Best regards, -- Th. Thomas. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
