On 2015-07-25 06:52, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Johannes Jost Meixner <[email protected]> (from Wed, 01 Jul > 2015 07:53:25 +0300): > >> All, >> >> Allan could use some help reviewing his suite of CentOS 6.6 64bit ports. >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1746 > > I did a complete review. I have one minor comment (should be easy to > fix). Allan, are you op to work on this this WE? If not, I'm at the > Essen Hackathon right now and I could spend some time on this (the minor > fix I want to see, the change of the pkg-message xmj wants to see, some > light testing, then committing it). Would you mind?
I do not mind at all, go ahead. You can 'commandeer' the differential in phabricator to upload your newer revisions. > >> What I'd like to see is, moving the Mk/ infrastructure to the point >> where it can support future, upcoming architectures -- think CentOS 7, >> recent Fedora version (only the ones that are supported for more than >> 6 months), etc. > > Any keywords or a 10 word description with ideas? Basically, it would be nice to clean it up in such a way that it isn't a ladder of if statements, but I am not sure if there is a better way. > >> I saw a working port of CentOS7 on GitHub, and a working Port of >> Fedora 19 somewhere... but I don't recall the links. Check > > Anyone with a URL for the CentOS 7 one? I think xmj was imagining this. I had a start on one a CentOS 7 port @ BSDCam last year, but it wasn't in a working state. > > Bye, > Alexander. -- Allan Jude
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
