On 27.02.12 23:52, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 27.02.2012 17:19, Florian Smeets wrote: >> maybe I'm missing something but this should not happen because of >> >> %%ETCSYMLINK%%@cwd / >> %%ETCSYMLINK%%etc/ssl/cert.pem > Not sure... I had the update fail for me because the link was still there... > Maybe, it is because I did not have the ETCSYMLINK option on, when I > installed > the earlier version of the package -- and created the symlink manually > afterwards. > > Whatever the reason the entry exists at install time, the port should not be > failing to register itself (after the complete installation) because of it. >> On deinstall the symlink should be removed. And that seems to work here. >> >> Also if we consider the patch shouldn't it be || instead of&& ? > Oh, yes, of course. Thanks! Yours, >
Committed. Thanks. Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
