On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Mark Linimon wrote: > FYI, I would like your approval on these (just the commit of BROKEN; I > do not expect you to try to fix them). > > [email protected] lang/gcc42
For lang/gcc42 I just added arm to NOT_FOR_ARCHS. On Thu, 23 Aug 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: > NOT and ONLY are meant for ports which by definition will never work > another arch (think x86info). In this case the ports are just broken. I think in case of an old version of some software NOT_FOR_ARCHS can also be valid, especially if the problem goes deeper (and it has been addressed in a newer version/newer port that is available). Gerald _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
