On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 10:40:32AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 09/09/2014 10:36, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:05:22AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > >>> Don't know how I messed up, I did a final sync with firefox 32 branch > >>> and we now > >>> have firefox 33.0.b1 instead of firefox32... > >>> > >>> I wonder if I should bring it back or keep it as is. > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> Bapt > >> > >> I've just noticed that myself and wanted to notify you about, but it's > >> good you already know. > >> > >> I would just leave it as it is now, betas of Firefox are now quite > >> stable. It just needs too be updated more often and if you don't feel > >> like keeping it up to date at least until 33 stable, I guess you should > >> revert it. > >> Thanks for the update anyway! > >> > > > > Because I have no time at all to update on regular basis and it seems that > > no > > committers have such time, I have committed the real 32.0 version > > > > regards, > > Bapt > > > You forgot about bumping PORTEPOCH.
Nope I did it on purpose, imho 33.0b1 didn't stay long enough so no need to pollute with PORTEPOCH, now if I got too much complain from user I will bump PORTEPOCH. regards, Bapt
pgpu8_VAjD1rw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
