https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214070
--- Comment #2 from Martin Birgmeier <[email protected]> --- Thank you for these remarks. I understand that maintaining separate -beta ports is too time-consuming. Maybe it would still be possible to just not include the release candidates in the release cycles for these ports as was done previously, or maybe add a flag which allows to easily skip upgrading of the port as long as it is based on a release candidate - although that might need a change in the port make infrastructure (and probably portmaster, too). In any case I want to add that I really appreciate how well these essential ports are maintained, and how quickly you resolve any issues (I submitted one myself not too long ago). -- Martin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
