https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238482
Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|www/firefox: 67.0_3,1 print |x11-fonts/fontconfig: |pre-formatting is HORRIBLE |Firefox print | |pre-formatting is HORRIBLE | |("bitmap font by default") Flags|maintainer-feedback+ |maintainer-feedback?(gnome@ | |FreeBSD.org) CC| |gn...@freebsd.org --- Comment #14 from Kubilay Kocak <ko...@freebsd.org> --- Analysis of actual underlying issues: - Unclear to users that program font rendering relies on fontconfig - Unclear to users what their options are for customising font rendering for their needs - Bitmap fonts or not by default, affects different user classes for different cases (see bug 225744) - To at least me: Unclear whether application specific font rendering defaults is possible currently, or possible at all The primary question we should be asking (on behalf of our users), is: In what ways can we improve their out of the box, and/or customisation, and/or initial learning experience for font rendering, considering that 'one size does not fit all' nature of font selection and program requirement diversity, with particular consideration given to ways to improve the port/package, if possible -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gecko To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gecko-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"