Hello, Freebsd-geom.

  Why some modules have geom_<name>(4) man page and others have
 g<name>(8)?

   Again, is it intentional or historical?

   Maybe, we need to link all geom_<name>(4) to g<name>(8) and vice
versa? It is good to be able to "man <modulename>" and don't "guess"
that geom_<name>.ko is documented in g<name>(8).

   I could provide patches for this -- but maybe I don't understand
 something and all these differences are intentional?

-- 
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <[email protected]>

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to