-------- In message <[email protected]>, Andriy Gapon writes: >On 12/03/2018 20:07, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> If we want to have an architectural sound way to do slow operations >> before any "user-I/O" is initiated, the right way to do so is to >> define new BIO_OPEN and BIO_CLOSE operation, and insist via asserts >> than all BIO_{READ|WRITE|DELETE} are wrapped in these.
>What do you think? I don't see that changing anything... GEOM rests on a set of assumptions, if you violate them, you get panics. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [email protected] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
