In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Polstra writes: : I would say it is not _acceptable_. The code shouldn't go into our : source tree until the known buffer overflow problems have been fixed. : It's just stupid to add buffer overflow problems to a program that is : always run as root. With my security officer hat on, I would *VETO* inclusion of any buffer overflows that have been pointed out and that the author has been too stuborn to fix. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Kris Kennaway
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bill Fumerola
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Boris Popov
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Wes Peters
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Julian Elischer
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. David O'Brien
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bill Fumerola
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Matthew Hunt
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. John Polstra
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. sthaug
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Warner Losh
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bill Fumerola
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Stephen J. Roznowski
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Peter Jeremy
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Bob Bishop
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Julian Elischer
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. lyndon
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Dominic Mitchell
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: tcpdump(1) additions. Kris Kennaway

