On Sat, 3 Jul 1999, Doug wrote:

> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > 
> > [Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
> > 
> > Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
> > 'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
> > build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built
> > with them, though. Also, although I caught and corrected a few spacing
> > nits caused by chopping off five letters, there may be some I didn't
> > catch.
> > 
> > If no-one objects, I'll commit this to -CURRENT in a few days.
> 
>       Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances
> where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with
> /usr/include/net/bpf.h? 
> 
>       In any case, this is a long overdue, and welcome change. Thank you. :)
> 
> Doug

How would that conflict? "bpf.h" is a local include, so it's not the same
include path set. Plus, it would only be included as <bpf.h> if -I/sys/net.

> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 

 Brian Fundakowski Feldman      _ __ ___ ____  ___ ___ ___  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]                   _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \ 
     FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!        _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
       http://www.FreeBSD.org/              _ |___/___/___/ 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Reply via email to