On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:31:38 -0700 (PDT)
Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :- I might be creating a very limited embedded system with just a few
> : small processes that are all written to *handle* out of memory situations.
>
> Really? Then setting resource limits from within each program is not
> a problem now is it? Then it will get a nice malloc failure instead
> of getting killed by the kernel.
See chris's point... Maybe you have one process that needs 10MB and a few
others that need 300K - 1MB. Resource limits are not useful in this
scenario.
...and, who said anything about using malloc()? :-)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Robert Elz
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Michael Richardson
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Neil A. Carson
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) David Brownlee
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Robert Elz
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral

