On Tue, 13 Jul 1999 16:16:07 -0700
Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt's point, which he's not making by virtue of talking too much, is
> that you can't make a "no overcommit" system behave like an "overcommit"
> system, and most people are used to the sort of things that the latter
> makes practical.
That's just silly. If people want a no-overcommit system, they have it,
and if they don't, they have that, too.
That's why you make it a switch. No, really, you *can* just make it
a switch.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) David Brownlee
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) David Greenman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Mike Smith
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Matthew Dillon
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Niall Smart
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Michael Richardson
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Brian F. Feldman
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Jason Thorpe
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Mike Smith
- Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2) Daniel C. Sobral

