Re: Swap overcommit (was Re: Replacement for grep(1) (part 2))

[lyndon]

> You don't seem to understand that a runaway process/one designed just
> to take up memory will be much more active than your little IMAP servers,
> and be the one killed, if this scheme were used.

No, what I don't understand is how the current behaviour can tell that
my temporary and *valid* need for a large chunk of memory does not make
me a runaway process, and therefore subject to death.

--lyndon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message