On Sat, 7 Aug 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F. >Feldman" writes: > : You can always use off_t with "%qd", (int64_t)foo. > > But that isn't portbale. %qd is a bsdism. %lld and %llu are the > latest C standards way to say that. Sorry, kinda used to quad rather than long long. I'm pretty sure ll isn't yet supported by the kernel printf functions... > > Warner > Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) | http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- quad_t and portability Sheldon Hearn
- Re: quad_t and portability Sheldon Hearn
- RE: quad_t and portability Alton, Matthew
- Re: quad_t and portability Don Lewis
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portability Warner Losh
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portability Warner Losh
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portability Patryk Zadarnowski
- Re: quad_t and portability Peter Wemm
- Re: quad_t and portability Bernd Walter
- Re: quad_t and portability Doug Rabson
- Re: quad_t and portability John Polstra
- Re: quad_t and portability Brian F. Feldman
- Re: quad_t and portabilit... Tony Finch
- Re: quad_t and portabilit... Brian F. Feldman