Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >
> > If you're writing unencumbered code, placing it under
> > libcompat/gnu may lead to confusion because all other
> > directory paths containing gnu contain GPL'd code.
> > Just stick it into libcompat.
>
> That doesn't fit with the current organization.
>
> Choose:
> a. fsf
> b. gnu
> c. glibc
d. other
src/lib/libcompat/{fsf,gnu,glibc} connotes GPL code.
src/lib/libcompat/other allows SysV, Solaris, Linux, etc.
compatibility functions.
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- RE: libcompat proposition Daniel O'Connor
- Re: libcompat proposition Chris Costello
- Re: libcompat proposition Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: libcompat proposition Warner Losh
- Re: libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposition Steve Kargl
- Re: libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposition Steve Kargl
- Re: libcompat proposition Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposit... Warner Losh
- Re: libcompat proposit... Nate Williams
- Re: libcompat proposit... Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: libcompat proposit... Jamie Howard
- Re: libcompat proposit... Jamie Howard
- Re: libcompat proposit... Sheldon Hearn
- Re: libcompat proposit... Jamie Howard
- Re: libcompat proposit... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: libcompat proposit... Sheldon Hearn

