On Thu, 12 Aug 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 02:21:11PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> >
> > I don't care if most of the
> > directories called "gnu" in the current tree contain GPLd code. How
>
> I had to read your message about 4 or 5 times before I realized that
> "Oh, the ``gnu'' in the directory name doesn't mean it's GPL'd code".
>
> And that was cognition time with context...without my conclusion would
> have been reverse and erroneous.
>
> src/lib/libgnucompat seems to be the best suggestion so far. I wonder
> where the line between libgnucompat and libfreebsdextension is,
> though.
I like my previous idea of libcompat/fsf, unless for some reason we
want libcompat only for BSD compatibility, in which case it will probably
never be changing...
After reading what Warner had to say, I am in agreement now that gnu
should not be used. And perhaps a TRULY free libiberty would be nice...
>
>
> --
> This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages.
>
Brian Fundakowski Feldman _ __ ___ ____ ___ ___ ___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ ___ | _ ) __| \
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ _ |___/___/___/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
