On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 12:50:54 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote: > I fully agree with this. If it can be cleanly added to the current test(1) > (which it can), we should have it, even if it were JUST for the sake of > portability. Ah, but I'm not proposing that we add new functionality to the existing test(1). The code gave me a head-ache. I'm proposing that we replace our test(1) entirely. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: New tests for test(1) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: New tests for test(1) Aaron Smith
- Re: New tests for test(1) Graham Wheeler
- Re: New tests for test(1) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: New tests for test(1) Bob Bishop
- Re: New tests for test(1) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: New tests for test(1) Martin Cracauer
- Re: New tests for test(1) Peter Jeremy
- Re: New tests for test(1) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: New tests for test(1) Brian F. Feldman
- Re: New tests for test(1) Sheldon Hearn
- Re: New tests for test(1) Brian F. Feldman
- Re: New tests for test(1) Sheldon Hearn

