On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Yes, but we need subsecond in the filesystems. Think about make(1) on > a blinding fast machine... Oh yes, I realize that. :-) It's just that I thought you were at one point suggesting having 128 bits to the left of the decimal point (128 bits worth of seconds). I was trying to say that'd be a bit much. :-) Take care, Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Michael Hancock
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Terry Lambert
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Chuck Silvers
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rew... Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS... Bill Studenmund
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Nate Williams
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rew... Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Julian Elischer
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Nate Williams
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rew... Julian Elischer
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Matthew Dillon
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Russell Cattelan
- RE: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Alton, Matthew
- Re: BSD XFS Port & BSD VFS Rewrite Mark Tinguely

