On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
>
> > + log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
> > + ifp->if_name, ifp->if_unit);
>
> You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
>
The third, in fact!
> So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
> "enabled" messages with "disabled" counterparts?
>
I think, the "disabled" messages output should be put under `if (verbose)'.
--
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] United Commercial Bank,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
