Following my previous post: I wrote .. >I believe a reversed dataset would be partitioned >into two subpartitions sorted in order at the 1'st pass of >the partitionings. Is this incorrect ? > Sorry, I'd confirmed BSD qsort's partitioning logic does not guarantee that "a reversed dataset would be partitioned into two subpartitions sorted in order at the 1'st pass of the partitionings". -Akira Wada To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Ville-Pertti Keinonen
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Narvi
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Archie Cobbs
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Christopher Seiwald
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Akira Wada
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Christopher Seiwald
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Archie Cobbs
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Nick Hibma
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Akira Wada
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Akira Wada
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Akira Wada
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Christopher Seiwald
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Tim Vanderhoek
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Akira Wada
- Re: anybody love qsort.c? Christopher Seiwald

