> The structure appears to be backwards compatible. > > The question I am putting to the group is whether it is "time" for us, > with today's large disks, to increase the system-compiled default > from 8 to 16 partitions. Instead of a-h we would have a-p It seems reasonable to me, although there may be issues with finding a bit in the minor number - I think they've pretty much all been taken. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITIONS from ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... Mark Newton
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Adrian Filipi-Martin
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Mark Newton
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MA... Andrzej Bialecki
- Re: Possibility of increasing defaul... Terry Lambert
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPARTITI... David Greenman
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MAXPAR... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MA... Matthew Dillon
- more... Re: Possibility of increasin... Matthew Dillon
- Re: more... Re: Possibility of ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing defaul... Julian Elischer
- Re: Possibility of increasing default MA... Terry Lambert
- Re: Possibility of increasing defaul... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Possibility of increasing d... Julian Elischer
- Re: Possibility of increasing d... Terry Lambert
- Re: Possibility of increasi... Matthew Dillon