On 28-Aug-99 Kris Kirby wrote: > It's not a bandwidth issue; it's a speed issue. I'm trying to find an > extremely cheap way to get data in and out of a PC. I've got the > National Semiconductor application sheets for the 8392(?) and plan on > using one "cut in half": Half duplex, but split into seperate TX and RX > lines. I'm also looking at a scaleable way to go up or down in speed, > without dealing with async... A layer two device if you will. RS232? RS485? VERY cheap and the later is at least moderatly resistant to noise :) --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum
- Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time depende... Julian Elischer
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Nick Hibma
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time depende... Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time depende... Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers tim... Kris Kirby
- Cheap link (was: Are the eth... Greg Lehey
- RE: Cheap link (was: Are the... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Cheap link (was: Are the... Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers tim... Nick Hibma
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Mike Smith
PGP signature
