In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Kris Kirby wrote: : > Both. The problem is that you can't cram a signal moving at 10 Mbps : > through a radio interface designed for 256K, even if it is bandwidth : > limited to 256K. I'm hoping the 3C503 is ancient enough that I can slow : > it down by yanking it's 20.0000 MHz crystal oscillator and feeding it a : > lower speed signal. I'm going to walk them down to see just how far I : > can go. After all, 2 Mbps isn't bad, it just requires a little more : > work. : : What about ARCnet? I have some frequecy hopping radio modems that use the 82593 to get 256kbps or so... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Kris Kirby
- Cheap link (was: Are the etherne... Greg Lehey
- RE: Cheap link (was: Are the eth... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Cheap link (was: Are the eth... Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time de... Nick Hibma
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Mike Smith
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Kris Kirby
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Warner Losh
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Warner Losh
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Matthew N. Dodd
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Warner Losh
- Re: Are the ethernet drivers time dependent? Max Khon

