On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> But it was to the subject on the Subject: line, Julian. We know what side
> you're on, but there are 2 sides to the argument. Isn't there some way
> that it can be set up to *optionally* have permission persistence?
Seems like a devfsd using the file monitoring hooks would work; you'd only
update the persistent store if you were running devfsd. devfsd would read
the store and init /dev with the contents. I think the only issue that
would involve thinking would be whiteouts (and the actual devfsd code of
course.)
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax |
| http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever |
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
