> FreeBSD has used wakeup_one() for this purpose since I wrote wakeup_one().
> In fact, it was the main reason I wrote it. Shortly after doing this the Apache
> Group changed to using file locking to coordinate access to the socket and
It may not be understanding the dialog correctly, but it seems like
optimizing FreeBSD for a poorly architected web server, however widely
used, is a sub-optimal allocation of effort.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Bosko Milekic
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Zach Brown
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Zach Brown
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Zach Brown
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Jonathan M. Bresler
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Tony Finch
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Matthew Dillon
- Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Remy Nonnenmacher
- Kip Macy

